← Search

Emily Marle

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 108W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Emily Marle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-08-30 · LTFC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Marle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-28 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-20 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · LTFC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Marle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · LTFC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Marle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Marle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Marle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Lash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-07-05 · LTFC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Marle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 96% of games
2.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 72.3% of games
3.0
92.9%
26W–2L · 68.9% of games
3.5
75%
24W–8L · 63.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 80.8% of games
6.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 63.2% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams