← Search

Elizabeth Bland

Chadds Ford, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 40W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Bland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-06-24 · SETs APPEAL · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Foga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · kinkySETs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-01 · SETs APPEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · Ball Whackers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Evitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · kinkySETs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Megill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
N/A
2025-06-05 · Slams · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Loraine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-30 · Rogue · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LeighAnne Frank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-15 · Slams · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynae Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
2025-05-09 · Rogue · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LeighAnne Frank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 67.5% of games
3.5
43.5%
30W–39L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert