← Search

Tonya Jenkins

— year-end
149 matches · 96W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tonya Jenkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Patricia Spellman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Glamour Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · LCTA40/Godfrey-Jackson/CTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jesusa Tuppil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · LCTA18/Godfrey-Jackson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jo Trippe-Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · Glamour Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Glamour Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-08 · Slammers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · QU33NS of the Court · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Glamour Slammers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.3%
68W–33L · 55% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 48% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams