← Search

Curt Barbee

— year-end
72 matches · 41W–31L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Curt Barbee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
Craig Roth / Steven Staley
2023-05-10 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2023-05-03 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Thomann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-01 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
Richard English / Michael Johnson
2023-04-26 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Dirstine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-04-17 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-04-12 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Dirstine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2022-09-08 · Have Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-08-30 · Have Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2022-08-18 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony Totorica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-08-11 · Have Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-08-09 · Have Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-08-02 · Have Fun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65.6%
21W–11L · 54% of games
7.0
50%
14W–14L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.5% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer