← Search

Veeresh Math

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
304 matches · 145W–159L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Veeresh Math to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history304 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Until Smooth · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Evelina Juchneviciute mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Until Smooth · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christeena Sevy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Until Smooth · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Wedeven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tej Kotha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chadd Cripe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tej Kotha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-15 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kumar Yeddula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kumar Yeddula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-08 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chadd Cripe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Dewey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-27 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.9% of games
3.5
55.7%
54W–43L · 51.8% of games
4.0
27.3%
15W–40L · 41.2% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.1% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.4% of games
6.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
40.5%
17W–25L · 45.2% of games
7.5mixed
37.1%
13W–22L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 29.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
94 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer