← Search

Julie LaMontagne

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 85W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie LaMontagne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Brooke Kuerbis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Zawadzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Matteri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Potter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Potter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Alan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacob Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Zawadzki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-08 · LaMontagne · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-4
W
2026-04-01 · LaMontagne · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
61%
25W–16L · 56.5% of games
3.5
50.8%
30W–29L · 49.2% of games
6.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Singles
23%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#2 Singles
8%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe