← Search

Adriana McCord

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 43W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Adriana McCord to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-08-01 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jody McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Damiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with TRIET NGUYEN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jody McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregg Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Heredia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cal Szueber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Venezia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Venezia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
22W–22L · 51.4% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 55.3% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe