← Search

Romie Griesmer

WILMINGTON, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 66W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Romie Griesmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Doubles Divas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Doubles Divas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Volko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Tina Dougherty championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Dougherty championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Tina Dougherty championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · DuPont Dynamite Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hamer-Maansson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · DuPont Dynamite Summer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hamer-Maansson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Doubles Divas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Rachel Claire Parisi / Katie Murphy
2026-06-09 · DuPont Volleygirls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Durnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · DuPont Dynamite Summer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-27 · DuPont Volleygirls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megary McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · DuPont Dynamite Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
59%
46W–32L · 54.9% of games
3.5
26.5%
13W–36L · 41.9% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal