← Search

Katherine Yokoyama

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 148W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Yokoyama to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
W
2026-09-01 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carli Fettig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with LOURDES MENDOZA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Milo Berger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rose Gerrard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Leslie Koppenhafer / Kayce McEwan
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Lan Duong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jenny Grob championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Milo Berger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rose Gerrard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Milo Berger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Jenny Grob championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Jenny Grob championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Jenny Grob championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.5%
62W–26L · 58.6% of games
4.5
60%
9W–6L · 48.3% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.3% of games
7.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
75%
24W–8L · 56.6% of games
8.5mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.2% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert