← Search

Pam Chlad

— year-end
51 matches · 8W–43L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Pam Chlad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2024-06-04 · Hot Shots · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gni Grossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-07 · Hot Shots · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy McGinty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-5, 1-0
L
2024-04-09 · Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Jablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Nancy Binder / Karen Clark
2023-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Logue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Logue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Ann Hugosson / Lisa Reiss
2023-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-4
L
2023-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Logue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Roma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Rosman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Logue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-04-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Christine Christiansen / Lisbet Christiansen
2022-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christine Segal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams4 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 41% of games
3.0
12.5%
5W–35L · 30.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova