← Search

Maribel Harrell

— year-end
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Maribel Harrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2024-02-11 · BETC-Porter/Ikeda 40+ 2024 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Que-Phuong Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-04 · BETC-Porter/Ikeda 40+ 2024 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Hollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-03-19 · BETC-Porter/Ikeda 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-03-12 · BETC-Porter/Ikeda 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vivian Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-02-05 · BETC-Porter/Ikeda 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Donovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2022-05-22 · BETC-Grove · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Donovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2022-05-01 · BETC-Grove · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Ikeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-04-29 · BETC-Grove · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Ikeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2021-06-20 · BETC-Grove/Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Vuong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2021-06-05 · BETC-Grove/Ikeda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2021-05-22 · BETC-Grove/Ikeda · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-05-09 · BETC-Grove/Ikeda · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Teams5 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer