← Search

Nathan Rarangol

Fuquay Varina, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 19W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Nathan Rarangol to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-07-21 · TOC.Rarangol · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · TOC.Rarangol · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with Louis Crow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · NMAC.Byrd · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · TOC.Bostic · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · TOC.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · NMAC.Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deraymes Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · NMAC.Byrd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srivatsan Ramesh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · NMAC.Byrd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srivatsan Ramesh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · NMAC.Byrd · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · NMAC.Byrd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louis Crow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · NMAC.Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louis Crow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.6% of games
4.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.2% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#2 Singles
13%
7 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams