← Search

Gary Fleming

Mentor, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 96W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gary Fleming to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-07-20 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Polcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Justin Aranavage / Lauren Smith
2026-07-18 · X18 7.0 2 MV3 Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Connell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-17 · X18 7.0 2 MV3 Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Kanetsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · A40 3.5M MV1 Falcone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Falcone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Gau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Polcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · X18 7.0 2 MV3 Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Connell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
John Petty / Scott Limestoll
2026-06-24 · A40 3.5M MV1 Falcone · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · X18 7.0 2 MV3 Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Connell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · A40 3.5M MV1 Falcone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Mercuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Polcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · A40 3.5M MV1 Falcone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Fasola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
87.5%
35W–5L · 63.1% of games
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 46.3% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 55.6% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 73.2% of games
7.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.9% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams