← Search

Roger Lee

— year-end
84 matches · 57W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Roger Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-07-01 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Duber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Preet Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Lebowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Duber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
William McIlroy / ZACHARY MCILROY
2026-06-08 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Groedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
George Chapman / James Spain
2026-06-01 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Preet Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Duber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · A40 3.5M CV Polcar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Kinnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-11-15 · C 6.5M CV Parker · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nagaraju Sarabu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-15 · C 8.5M CV Kraig · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicholas Laskaris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 62.3% of games
3.5
48%
12W–13L · 47.9% of games
6.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 65.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#1 Singles
25%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova