← Search

Lucia Chavez

— year-end
114 matches · 78W–36L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lucia Chavez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Laizure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Ellen Venator
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · OK/Patel-Madden/18&over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Laizure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-20 · OK/Patel-Madden/18&over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Nevin-Hesselroth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · AceHoles 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phillip Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · OK/Patel-Madden/18&over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leila Fadaiepour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-08 · OK/Patel-Madden/18&over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-22 · Bratz · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leila Fadaiepour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-10-15 · Bratz · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kimberly Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-08 · Bratz · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Addison Stiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-01 · Bratz · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chelsea Yamamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.6% of games
3.0
75%
21W–7L · 61.1% of games
3.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 50.9% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
6.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 69.1% of games
7.0
80%
12W–3L · 56.1% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova