← Search

Rhonda Lincoln

— year-end
225 matches · 106W–119L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Rhonda Lincoln to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
L
2026-09-02 · VVS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JENNIE PRICE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Net Nerds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Net Nerds · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Miranda Kieffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-15 · Net Nerds · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Miranda Kieffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · VVS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JENNIE PRICE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Mid Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Bangasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · VVS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JENNIE PRICE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Hendrick · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susie Luebbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-03 · Mid Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tessa Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · Hise/Wise Aces 55&over7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JENNIE PRICE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · Hendrick · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-18 · VVS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Avilone Doan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams53 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.5% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.5% of games
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.6% of games
4.0
50%
47W–47L · 49.9% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.8% of games
7.0
75%
21W–7L · 58% of games
8.0
33.9%
19W–37L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert