← Search

Meredith Bond

— year-end
107 matches · 40W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meredith Bond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-03-19 · A55 6.0W CRC Shaw · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Guepfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · A18 3.0W CRC1 Falberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Viktoryia Statsevych
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-19 · A55 6.0W CRC Shaw · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-12 · A55 6.0W CRC Shaw · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lela Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-16 · C 5.5W CRC2 King · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Zidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-02 · C 5.5W CRC2 King · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melanie Weisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-05 · C 5.5W CRC2 King · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Margo Best
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-16 · NEO/Chopra/A18/2.5W · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-06-19 · A18 3.0W CRC Chopra · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Shapero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-18 · NEO/Chopra/A18/2.5W · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-15 · A18 3.0W CRC Chopra · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Weisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-02 · A18 3.0W CRC2 Weisman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
61.5%
24W–15L · 54.9% of games
3.0
8%
2W–23L · 33.7% of games
5.5
35%
14W–26L · 46% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#1 Singles
20%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer