← Search

Karin Conroy

— year-end
381 matches · 229W–152L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karin Conroy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history381 matches
W
2026-09-01 · SC:Conroy:Cropper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · SC:Conroy:Cropper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Cropper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · SC:Conroy:Cropper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Schwope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · Apex:Conroy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Schwope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · Apex:Conroy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Konieczko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · HSB:FortyLove:Schwope · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Fagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · HSB:FortyLove:Schwope · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · HSB:FortyLove:Schwope · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Salaun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Neverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · SC:Conroy:Cropper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Cropper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-5
W
2026-05-17 · SC:Conroy:Cropper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Cropper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-5
Teams88 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
71%
22W–9L · 59.1% of games
4.0
59.3%
134W–92L · 53.5% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 44.4% of games
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.5% of games
8.0
60.9%
28W–18L · 52.4% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
61%
25W–16L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
181 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
86 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova