← Search

Jackeline Olney

Peterborough, NH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 68W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jackeline Olney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-08-25 · MITC:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · MITC:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ned Olney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · MITC:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-21 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ned Olney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Teixeira mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · LNH:Ackerman:Allard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Neverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Ali Ashare / Melissa Smith
2026-06-02 · LNH:Ackerman:Allard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Neverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-26 · LNH:Ackerman:Allard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerrin Mazzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · LNH:Ackerman:Allard · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · LNH:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
L
2026-05-17 · LNH:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 50.8% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
64%
16W–9L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 63% of games
8.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert