← Search

Rhonda Corley

— year-end
70 matches · 25W–45L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Rhonda Corley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-03-11 · Legacy Park (Tina Parker)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Veres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-24 · Legacy Park (Tina Parker)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-18 · Fowler/Dellinger · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Suskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-10 · Legacy Park (Tina Parker)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Swatling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-09 · Fowler/Dellinger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Gambill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-21 · Fowler/Dellinger · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Fernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-08 · Legacy Park (Rhonda Corley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Noblit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 3-6
L
Debi Larson / Laura Thompson
2025-12-04 · Legacy Park (Rhonda Corley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Suskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-22 · Legacy Park (Stacey Tuchmann)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Beddawi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-13 · Legacy Park (Rhonda Corley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Suskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-06 · Legacy Park (Stacey Tuchmann)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-29 · Legacy Park (Stacey Tuchmann)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianne Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40%
12W–18L · 48.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
13W–26L · 43.3% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova