← Search

Andrew Hillman

Pensacola, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 29W–38L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andrew Hillman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Brabham - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · Brabham - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ed Souza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-05 · Brabham - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Whittenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-01 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Whittenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-25 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Escambia/Wallace · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-17 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-10 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farley Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.9% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.5% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37%
10W–17L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova