← Search

Casey Pickett

Bountiful, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
318 matches · 184W–134L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Casey Pickett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history318 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Buttcaps · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quinn Pritchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alessandra Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christy Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sterbenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · Buttcaps · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quinn Pritchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sterbenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendy Widerburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Jennifer Korb / Lisa Caldwell
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Wendy Widerburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Wendy Widerburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 58.6% of games
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.7% of games
4.0
57.6%
34W–25L · 53.7% of games
4.5
50%
38W–38L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 66% of games
7.5mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 68.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
28W–20L · 55.5% of games
8.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
127 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova