← Search

JaNae Smith

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
409 matches · 221W–188L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JaNae Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history409 matches
W
Amy Powell / Regan Tieff
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Christy Owens championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-08-11 · Tri Breakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · Tri Breakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teisa Linscott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Roggensack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendy Widerburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Marz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Utah/Koeliker/55&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gretchen Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Cutrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gretchen Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Tri Breakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teisa Linscott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teisa Linscott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Cutrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams102 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
40%
4W–6L · 51% of games
4.0
65.2%
88W–47L · 56.3% of games
4.5
37.5%
48W–80L · 45.8% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 54.6% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
61.1%
22W–14L · 51.6% of games
8.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.7% of games
9.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
145 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
133 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
120 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert