← Search

Samuel Andrus

— year-end
161 matches · 95W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Samuel Andrus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-07-01 · Early Risers 18+ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Early Risers 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Mecham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Early Risers 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaden McCarney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · Early Risers 18+ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Early Risers 18+ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-01 · Early Risers 18+ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · Early Risers 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Bessey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
Andrew Kim / Jennifer Colson
2026-04-26 · Mixed Marvels · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jo Roby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Mixed Marvels · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Boyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-20 · ID/ROBY/TRILEVEL/M4.0/4.5/5.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-30 · ID/ROBY/TRILEVEL/M4.0/4.5/5.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Roby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-01-23 · ID/ROBY/TRILEVEL/M4.0/4.5/5.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.3% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.5%
27W–13L · 56.1% of games
4.5
35%
7W–13L · 41.5% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 56.5% of games
8.5mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 55.6% of games
9.0mixed
7.1%
1W–13L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
10%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams