← Search

Robyn Larkin

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 82W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robyn Larkin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-07-23 · DCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Filsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · DCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Remington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · DCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · DCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riisa Dikeou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · DCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Remington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · DCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · DCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Remington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-09 · DCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riisa Dikeou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · DCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Filsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · DCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Remington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · DCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riisa Dikeou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-12 · DCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layne Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
69%
58W–26L · 59.2% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova