← Search

Janice Jensen

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 92W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janice Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
W
2026-08-18 · CP YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjana Chintalapudi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · CP YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Cahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · CP YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjana Chintalapudi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · APR-E RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Benjamin Reimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Laura James championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with David Tulloch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Nabeel Meghji championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · APR-E RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Benjamin Reimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · DTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · APR-E RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Benjamin Reimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · DTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-02 · DTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aneesha Bharwani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
44%
55W–70L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.6% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
39%
16W–25L · 45.6% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert