← Search

Shepard Simpson

— year-end
190 matches · 110W–80L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Shepard Simpson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Basham-Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Isabelle Riviere-Bowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Riley O'Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Lord-Schaaf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Riley O'Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendall Hanks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trinity Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-11 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-14 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendall Hanks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-16 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miranda Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-26 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Lord-Schaaf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-06 · Fridley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorrie Crossett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 54.3% of games
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.7% of games
4.0
67.3%
37W–18L · 56.8% of games
4.5
56.4%
44W–34L · 49.8% of games
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal