← Search

Kendall Hanks

— year-end
240 matches · 141W–99L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kendall Hanks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Therese Basham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Herita Akamah / Andrea Mueller
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Therese Basham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Caitlin Winey / Kevin Chen
2026-08-12 · Cimarolli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shawn Khosla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Fridley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellie Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · Cimarolli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ray Ohara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Cimarolli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Paul Gontarz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ellie Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-15 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shepard Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-09 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacqueline Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Teams46 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games
4.0
82.9%
34W–7L · 62.3% of games
4.5
47%
31W–35L · 49.1% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 63% of games
8.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.9% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 55.9% of games
8.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42% of games
9.0mixed
40.5%
15W–22L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
40 matches
#1 Singles
9%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
21 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova