← Search

Darren Nelson

South Jordan, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
262 matches · 114W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Darren Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history262 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirk Amidan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shawn Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Noyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Dean Bachman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Killpack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clark Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Bliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dhruvan Gopinath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Farr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
58.8%
57W–40L · 52.7% of games
3.5
25.6%
20W–58L · 39.9% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 54.8% of games
6.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
71 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams