← Search

Andrew Bliss

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 121W–166L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Bliss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history287 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Bliss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
Ryan Fyfe / Juliet Hanson
2026-08-21 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diana Cole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ryan Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chandler Farr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · Liberty Park-Wright · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Nejatifar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ryan Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · Sports Mall-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ryan Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-24 · Liberty Park-Wright · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · Sports Mall-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-10 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Bliss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 47% of games
3.0
76.7%
33W–10L · 61.5% of games
3.5
26.8%
26W–71L · 42.2% of games
4.0
5.6%
1W–17L · 35% of games
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.8% of games
6.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
43.2%
19W–25L · 48% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
74 matches
#2 Singles
4%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams