← Search

Kadee Wolfgram

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 100W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kadee Wolfgram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-09-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Kellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manal Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · Orange Crush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · Orange Crush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Trentman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · LP- Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Wolfgram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · Liberty Park- Leishman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Wolfgram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · Liberty Park- Leishman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Mattiussi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
56.1%
37W–29L · 53.1% of games
3.5
48.6%
34W–36L · 48.1% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 27.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
14 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert