← Search

Steve Fabrizius

— year-end
122 matches · 61W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Fabrizius to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-07-24 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Norberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · HOA/Craig/55&over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Brez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · HOA/Craig/55&over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Kreamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-08 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Norberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-18 · HOA/Craig/55&over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-20 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · Fabrizius, Steve · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN CRAIG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Norberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · Fabrizius, Steve · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randall Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-30 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Norberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-08 · Craig, John · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Brez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52.5%
31W–28L · 51.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 23.8% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert