← Search

Katie Reed

— year-end
82 matches · 53W–29L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Katie Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-08-08 · Team Brady (CONFIRMED)* · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Glaze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
L
2026-08-08 · Team Brady (CONFIRMED)* · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Glaze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-08-08 · Team Brady (CONFIRMED)* · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kendra Noyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
L
2026-08-08 · Team Brady (CONFIRMED)* · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Glaze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-8
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Wilhelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Wilhelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Laterveer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Saracki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micaela Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea McNeil Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.2%
42W–17L · 58% of games
4.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 49% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer