← Search

Kirsten Scott

— year-end
94 matches · 28W–66L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Kirsten Scott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Team Salkin (CONFIRMED)* · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeanette Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-8
L
2026-08-08 · Team Salkin (CONFIRMED)* · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jodi Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-9
W
2026-07-21 · Atlanta AC (Robyn Salkin)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Salkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Atlanta AC (Robyn Salkin)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Salkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robyn Salkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Atlanta AC (Robyn Salkin)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · Atlanta AC (Robyn Salkin)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Golub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Atlanta AC (Robyn Salkin)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-16 · Atlanta AC (Robyn Salkin)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Golub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Sigler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Sigler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 6-1
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.7% of games
3.5
21.6%
16W–58L · 38.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#1 Singles
21%
20 matches
#2 Singles
19%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert