← Search

Ree Greteman

— year-end
56 matches · 33W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ree Greteman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Ellerbroek & Bliss: LifeTime · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trinh Le-Coulter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-10 · Ellerbroek & Bliss: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maria Fedorova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara van Wyngarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · IA/Avilez/40&Over7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Versteeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Snedegar & Hagan: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara van Wyngarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · Auer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Avilez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-29 · Gillum/Olafson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ellerbroek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-07 · Snedegar & Hagan: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara van Wyngarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-06 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Snedegar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-08 · IA/Avilez/40&Over7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Versteeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-07 · Snedegar & Hagan: LifeTime · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renea Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-30 · Gillum/Olafson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Dial
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.8% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games
4.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.5% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 36.1% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer