← Search

Michelle Rice

— year-end
71 matches · 28W–43L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Michelle Rice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Whipp/Pham · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Landon Geren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Olafson & Hill-Matthes: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sonja Heying
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Olafson & Hill-Matthes: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Keren Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Eganhouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · Schipper & Rice: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Heying
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-15 · Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Upright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-3
W
2026-04-04 · Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Eganhouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-07 · Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Hempel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · Schipper & Rice: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Claypool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-31 · Schipper & Rice: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Avilez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-25 · Pham/Whipp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Kiekhaefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-17 · Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Upright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
6W–6L · 56.2% of games
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.6% of games
3.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 54.4% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 45% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova