← Search

Brian Thomeczek

Bellbrook, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 73W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brian Thomeczek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-06-26 · QRRC-Beiersdorfer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Figueroa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-19 · QRRC-Beiersdorfer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kaori Delsing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-01 · QRRC Hoban · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Beiersdorfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Brian Grant / Ryan Paul
2025-09-12 · QRRC Hoban · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donald Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Nathan Lucas / Ryan Paul
2025-01-26 · QRRC Hoban · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gopal Bhat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-04 · QRRC Hoban · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Cary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-16 · QRRC Hoban · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Enrico Ferri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-27 · QRRC Hoban · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Slattery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-11 · KTC-Madoffori · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Konnert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-05-04 · QRRC-Hoban · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donald Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-27 · KTC-Madoffori · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gopal Bhat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-03-30 · QRRC-Beiersdorfer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sydney Corbean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 65% of games
4.0
62.5%
20W–12L · 51.7% of games
4.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 34.5% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 61% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 63.3% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams