← Search

Gloria Morison

Peterborough, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 158W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gloria Morison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
W
2026-09-01 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Glenn Peck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Carnevale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Glenn Peck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Passero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · MITC:Morison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sordillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
59.1%
52W–36L · 54.4% of games
3.5
53.3%
49W–43L · 51.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 56.1% of games
6.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.4% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
27W–27L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
188 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
27 matches
#1 Singles
10%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe