← Search

Maureen Adams

— year-end
81 matches · 58W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Maureen Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-08-04 · MTS:Scharpf:Gantrish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-28 · MTS:Scharpf:Gantrish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Gantrish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · MTS:Scharpf:Gantrish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-19 · MTS:Padgett:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · MTS:Scharpf:Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-1
L
2026-05-16 · MTS:Scharpf:Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-8
W
2026-05-05 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-31 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-03 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Putnam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-02-03 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Saghir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams27 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
18W–0L · 70.8% of games
3.5
70%
28W–12L · 58.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert