← Search

Patricia McNulty

Covina, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 74W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia McNulty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Rebelettes-McNulty-Dawson Park/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dacayo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
Junko Noguchi / Frank Kalinowski
2026-08-23 · SGV Racketeers-Ramirez-WN/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vernon Price mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-08 · SGV Racketeers-Ramirez-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Alvarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · IE-Andulka-Palmer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Zhu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · IE-Andulka-Palmer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Novarro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Reginal Knott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · IE-Andulka-Palmer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jordana Ridland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · IE-Andulka-Palmer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kam Jara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · IE-Andulka-Palmer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
49.5%
50W–51L · 52.2% of games
3.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 37.1% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 43% of games
7.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 33.1% of games
6.0mixed
40%
14W–21L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#1 Singles
13%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
23 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams