← Search

Ji Park

Franklin Lakes, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 48W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ji Park to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-04-10 · Apex · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomira Rozar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-03 · Split Step & Chill · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Lai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-20 · Split Step & Chill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marco Donnini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-13 · Split Step & Chill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Pudup mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · Matchpoint: TriUmphant · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomira Rozar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-20 · Always Be Poaching · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marco Donnini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kelly Minichiello championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-02-01 · Matchpoint: TriUmphant · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomira Rozar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-23 · Always Be Poaching · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Pudup mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · Matchpoint Gracefully Acing · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helaine Wohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Jing Li / Kyle Eng
2026-01-09 · Always Be Poaching · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Pudup mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-05 · Always Be Poaching · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Pudup mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 63.8% of games
4.0
50%
10W–10L · 49% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.1% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams