← Search

Scott Leiman

— year-end
133 matches · 78W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Leiman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
Thomas Bigosinski / Donatas Augylius
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with FLORIS VREEDENBURGH championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Kishore Chandrasekharan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-09 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Spin Doctors · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-26 · Spin Doctors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Spin Doctors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · Spin Doctors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Balthis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · Spin Doctors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edgar Cala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-04 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allen Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62.1%
41W–25L · 54.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
56.5%
26W–20L · 52.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams