← Search

Jessie Seaman

Ashland City, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 38W–40L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessie Seaman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Coggin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Coggin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olga Spittle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McDugald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Gilbert-Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-02 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 49.5% of games
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 45.9% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.5% of games
6.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#1 Singles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova