← Search

Claudia Paz

FRANKLIN, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 45W–42L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Claudia Paz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McDugald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
Katie Anderson / Meaghan Stranix
2026-06-27 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Gilbert-Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Sue Anne Perry / Stephanie Nelson
2026-06-13 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McDugald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 57.6% of games
3.5
51.2%
22W–21L · 49.2% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.7% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 26.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
12%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova