← Search

Kim Isaak

— year-end
36 matches · 22W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Isaak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2025-11-17 · Fall 4.5 PTC Tracey Stone W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Guaranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · Trice as Nice · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kia Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-10-17 · Trice as Nice · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kia Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-09-29 · Fall 4.5 PTC Tracey Stone W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Guaranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-05 · 8.5 PHO Wagner Tue PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Helen Filby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-03 · 8.5 PHO Wagner Tue PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Arielle Shinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-04-27 · Picante Wagner W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Guaranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-04-25 · Picante Wagner W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kia Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-04-07 · 4.5 PTC Wagner W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kia Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-03-24 · 4.5 PTC Wagner W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Champagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-03 · 4.5 PTC Wagner W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Guaranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-03 · 4.5 PTC Wagner W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Guaranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 61.8% of games
4.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.3% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams