← Search

Molly Ehrig

— year-end
36 matches · 27W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Molly Ehrig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Milam 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hannah Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Milam 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hannah Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Milam 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Bowen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · Milam 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Shane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Milam 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Shane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Harlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Bair-Epps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sally Eagleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Bair-Epps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Harlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-23 · Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-16 · Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 80.5% of games
4.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.9% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.2% of games
8.5
75%
6W–2L · 60.4% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#1 Singles
22%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova