← Search

Sarah Howell

— year-end
71 matches · 47W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Howell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Arkaev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Betty Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Yadkin/Ivester/18+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Buchanan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · Yadkin/Ivester/18+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Buchanan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Mays 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Buchanan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layne Saunders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · Mays 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Buchanan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Mays 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Laney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Mays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams34 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 74.3% of games
4.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 62.3% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.5% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.2% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#2 Singles
16%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams