← Search

Doris Kerr

Kennett Square, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 155W–127L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Doris Kerr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history282 matches
W
2026-09-01 · What's Up Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Nicolson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Costelloe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jaclyn Groenen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Lynn Sundblad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · What's Up Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Dumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · What's Up Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Nicolson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Point Taken · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Marsilio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Dumas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · What's Up Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Hewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Sally Finley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Sally Finley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Marsilio championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
72.8%
83W–31L · 58.1% of games
4.5
21.2%
14W–52L · 41.4% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60.3%
38W–25L · 53.4% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
51 matches
#1 Singles
16%
45 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams