← Search

Tiffany Marsilio

Chester Springs, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 109W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Marsilio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Bernabeo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Bernabeo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-29 · Vamos! · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy O'Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Point Taken · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doris Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Point Taken · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bernabeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Vamos! · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy O'Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-1
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Doris Kerr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · Point Taken · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bernabeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Point Taken · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Bria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-29 · Double Fierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · What's Up · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doris Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-12 · Passing Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy O'Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
75.6%
59W–19L · 61.2% of games
4.5
30.4%
7W–16L · 40.6% of games
8.0
100%
7W–0L · 72.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams