← Search

Monaliza Onia

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 73W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Monaliza Onia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-09-04 · LDAN-Andiloro-Darnell/Edgemoor · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · LMLA-Laliberte/CSD · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · LMLA-Laliberte/CSD · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · LDAN-Andiloro-Darnell/Edgemoor · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Bessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deedee Beem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Bessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anneliese Lansing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · LSBR-BRYNN/NMP · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Tirabassi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-06 · LSBR-BRYNN/NMP · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · LSBR-BRYNN/NMP · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sayra Brynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 57.7% of games
3.5
42.6%
26W–35L · 47.2% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.8% of games
6.5
51.3%
20W–19L · 54.4% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams